Journal of JCIC

Online edition: ISSN 2432–2342
JCIC学会事務局 JCIC学会事務局
〒162-0801東京都新宿区山吹町358-5アカデミーセンター Academy Center, 358-5 Yamabuki-cho, Shinju-ku, Tokyo 162-0801, Japan
Journal of JCIC 10(1): 3-7 (2025)
doi:10.20599/jjcic.10.3

症例報告症例報告

乳児期にRashkind PDA occlusion systemで閉鎖したPDAの残存シャントに対し,成人期にADOIIで再閉鎖を行った一例Closure of a residual patent ductus arteriosus initially treated with a Rashkind PDA occlusion system in Infancy

榊原記念病院小児循環器内科Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute ◇ Tokyo, Japan

受付日:2025年6月23日Received: June 23, 2025
受理日:2025年9月18日Accepted: September 18, 2025
発行日:2025年12月20日Published: December 20, 2025
HTMLPDFEPUB3

本症例は,乳児期にRashkind PDA occlusion systemを用いて動脈管開存症(PDA)のカテーテル閉鎖術を受けた後,成人期に残存シャントの増大が認められ,Amplatzer Duct Occluder II(ADOII)を用いて再閉鎖を施行した一例である.無症候性であっても経年的に血行動態の変化が生じ得るPDAにおいて,左室容量負荷や左室拡大が観察されたことから,再評価と再介入を行った.再閉鎖にはADOIIを選択し,既存のデバイスとの干渉を回避するよう慎重に手技を施行した.術後はシャント閉鎖が良好に維持され,左室拡大も軽減した.本症例は,長期フォローアップの重要性および柔軟な治療戦略の必要性を示すものである.

We report a case of a 35-year-old male with a history of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treated with a Rashkind PDA occlusion system during infancy, who presented in adulthood with an enlarged residual shunt. Despite being asymptomatic, follow-up echocardiography revealed left ventricular dilation and an increased Qp/Qs ratio, prompting further investigation. Cardiac catheterization confirmed PDA with hemodynamic significance, leading to a decision for reintervention. Transcatheter closure was successfully performed using an Amplatzer Duct Occluder II(ADOII), carefully avoiding interference with the existing Rashkind device. Post-procedural imaging confirmed complete closure without residual leak. The patient experienced no complications and was discharged on the third day after the procedure. At six-month and 11-month follow-ups, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter had improved, and no recurrence of shunt was observed. This case underscores the importance of long-term follow-up in patients with prior PDA closure, especially those with residual shunts. Even PDA may warrant reevaluation and intervention due to potential progressive cardiac remodeling. Furthermore, the case highlights the efficacy and safety of ADO II in a “device-in-device” strategy for residual PDA. It also suggests that late reintervention should not be regarded as a failure of initial therapy, but rather as an adaptive response to long-term anatomical and hemodynamic changes.

Key words: patent ductus arteriosus (PDA); Rashkind PDA occlusion system; Amplatzer Duct Occluder II; transcatheter intervention

This page was created on 2025-10-01T17:01:29.438+09:00
This page was last modified on 2025-12-16T11:48:58.000+09:00


このサイトは(株)国際文献社によって運用されています。